Why Planet of the Apes (1968) Is More Than a Movie About Talking Monkeys
- 21/12/2023

"You destroyed his memory! His mind! His identity! And you want to do the same to me!".That's the powerful idea that makes Planet of the Apes still very relatable. What happens when the key human traits are taken away from us - Identity, speech and culture?
lanet of the Apes is an American science fiction movie from 1968. It’s directed by Franklin J. Schaffner and has Charlton Heston playing the lead character: astronaut George Taylor. He accidentally travels to a planet where apes rule over humans.
And if we gaze beyond the elevator pitch of “humans and apes… but reversed”, it may also be a sociological experiment that mirrors how entitled our culture may be and about how high ignorance goes hand in hand with high intelligence.
*I will shorten the title of Planet of the Apes to PotA. I will also talk about the plot. But don't worry about spoilers. I won't mention the T-Rex. Joking, there isn't a T-Rex in the movie.
The story
The beginning of the movie makes you think you’re watching an interspatial Robinson Crusoe. Three astronauts land on an deserted planet. And at that point, the movie is not in a hurry. It lets you feel the solitude and spaciousness of the beautiful mysterious planet with very wide shots. But right when you think you know what’s going on, it turns into a straightforward horror movie, where hairy monsters hunt people.
Leon Shamroy, the cinematographer, is a master at visual storytelling and at hiding and revealing plot details. It really seems like him, the director and editor had the same fluid vision and sensibility about the way the story should unfold. Because it’s a movie set in the future and filmed in the 60s, it also has a certain realism to it. It’s rough, grainy and tactile, like a documentary.
The apes and their planet
The Ape city looks both familiar to human culture and slightly surreal. But never clear on what historical point the apes have reached. It’s both medieval and modern, with ape psychologists.
The apes can’t conceive humans as having a soul or an identity. Even their ancient writings mention this. There is a scene where the apes harshly dismiss the protagonist’s intelligence – and ignore the fact that he can talk, calling it a trick – because the human cannot recite their ancient scripture. Same as if we would dismiss a talking chimp for not knowing the national anthem.
This is the sociological and more profound layer of the movie that may just be one of the reasons it stood the test of time. It challenges how we judge intelligence and identity. I never considered – until watching a making-of documentary for this movie – how one of the main production concerns was to make the apes look… not funny. What a great idea from the production team to anticipate it! Because we do expect apes to be silly and eat bananas.
In conclusion

By the way